| the case of the gays | |
|
+8Astell glazed_ Bermudian Zippiner Albel jellybean Xikkari Abagail 12 posters |
is gay marage ok? | yes | | 69% | [ 20 ] | no | | 24% | [ 7 ] | dunno | | 7% | [ 2 ] | yes becuse I am gay | | 0% | [ 0 ] |
| Total Votes : 29 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Abagail Board Member Plus
Number of posts : 33 Registration date : 2006-04-01
| Subject: the case of the gays Thu 8 Jun - 4:13 | |
| should gay marage be uhh umm...........do abel vote yes on the case of the gays like im not gay but still it should be ok | |
|
| |
Xikkari Mystic Staff Member
Number of posts : 897 Located : See that shady figure outside your window? =) Registration date : 2006-03-21
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Thu 8 Jun - 4:14 | |
| | |
|
| |
jellybean Junior Member
Number of posts : 18 Registration date : 2006-06-04
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Thu 8 Jun - 5:01 | |
| I see nothing wrong with it so yes its ok | |
|
| |
Albel The Competition is ON!
Number of posts : 517 Age : 35 Registration date : 2006-03-21
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Fri 9 Jun - 0:00 | |
| I actually think I have a strong argument here.. In this situation.
No, gay marriage shouldn't be allowed. Why? Gay marriage is a HUGE contradiction. by DEFINITION marriage is between a man and a woman. By saying this I shouldn't be considered a gay/lesbian hater because it' is what the word is by DEFINITION.
On the other hand, while gay marriage shouldn't be allowed, I think there should be something with the exact same benefits of marriage but called something different to make sure that this "union"(what i will be calling it from here on) isn't on the religious level that marriage is.
In politics and what not there's supposed to be a seperation of religion and state, however some of our political figures have confused the two and melded them together into some sort of unjust, seemingly hatefilled verbal war.
Urgh, maybe more later but I think you get my point. | |
|
| |
Xikkari Mystic Staff Member
Number of posts : 897 Located : See that shady figure outside your window? =) Registration date : 2006-03-21
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Fri 9 Jun - 0:33 | |
| - Albel wrote:
- I actually think I have a strong argument here.. In this situation.
No, gay marriage shouldn't be allowed. Why? Gay marriage is a HUGE contradiction. by DEFINITION marriage is between a man and a woman. By saying this I shouldn't be considered a gay/lesbian hater because it' is what the word is by DEFINITION.
On the other hand, while gay marriage shouldn't be allowed, I think there should be something with the exact same benefits of marriage but called something different to make sure that this "union"(what i will be calling it from here on) isn't on the religious level that marriage is.
In politics and what not there's supposed to be a seperation of religion and state, however some of our political figures have confused the two and melded them together into some sort of unjust, seemingly hatefilled verbal war.
Urgh, maybe more later but I think you get my point. Lots of big words .-. But I see your point x3 | |
|
| |
Zippiner The Competition is ON!
Number of posts : 224 Age : 34 Located : In your shadow Registration date : 2006-04-11
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Fri 9 Jun - 6:17 | |
| Your last choice 'Yes because I am Gay' is EXTREMLY rude, if not pointing fingers to a few people.
Other than that, I voted yes.
Now I have a few words to say:
SEPERATION OF CURCH AND STATE
In the bible, Sodomy is punished by god. While two daughters 'laying' with their father and baring his children is not punished by god... ...Yet we do not allow little girls to have intercourse with, and bare children to their fathers LEGALLY in America.
If we are going to go by the bible for gays, let's go by the bible for incest too.
Think about it. | |
|
| |
Abagail Board Member Plus
Number of posts : 33 Registration date : 2006-04-01
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Sun 11 Jun - 22:38 | |
| I knew no one would pick that I dont know why I put it there I just wanted another answer to be avilabel | |
|
| |
Bermudian Mystic Staff Member
Number of posts : 190 Age : 33 Located : Whats it to you? Registration date : 2006-03-27
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Mon 12 Jun - 19:53 | |
| Foock yes, I love gay's, One of my friends at school is gay <3 | |
|
| |
glazed_ Senior Member Plus
Number of posts : 56 Age : 33 Located : Somewhere Over the Rainbow.. Registration date : 2006-07-09
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Sat 29 Jul - 4:00 | |
| Well, I believe that gay marriage should be allowed. Its not just because I'm bi, but because everyone should make their own choices. No one is getting hurt by the decision..Five words for the people that are homophobes.. Butt out of people's lives..
Last edited by on Mon 4 Sep - 20:52; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Astell Mega Member
Number of posts : 154 Age : 29 Located : EAST COAST BABY Registration date : 2006-08-28
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Thu 31 Aug - 3:27 | |
| I understand what Albel is saying (lots of big words) and I think that gay marriage/union should be allowed. There's nothing wrong with being gay, one of my best friends has 2 moms. | |
|
| |
Xikkari Mystic Staff Member
Number of posts : 897 Located : See that shady figure outside your window? =) Registration date : 2006-03-21
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Thu 31 Aug - 3:28 | |
| Somebody told me about a girl Who had lesbian parents And eveyrbody made fun of her So she sued the school and won =D | |
|
| |
Woltar The Competition is ON!
Number of posts : 209 Age : 36 Registration date : 2006-05-23
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Thu 31 Aug - 3:30 | |
| - Zippiner wrote:
- Your last choice 'Yes because I am Gay' is EXTREMLY rude, if not pointing fingers to a few people.
Other than that, I voted yes.
Now I have a few words to say:
SEPERATION OF CURCH AND STATE
In the bible, Sodomy is punished by god. While two daughters 'laying' with their father and baring his children is not punished by god... ...Yet we do not allow little girls to have intercourse with, and bare children to their fathers LEGALLY in America.
If we are going to go by the bible for gays, let's go by the bible for incest too.
Think about it. Adding to that because I was going to say something. Marriage is another word for HOLY matrimony, therefore it is not legally allowed to be recognized by the state under the same conditions. However, "MARRIAGE" is allowed to be recognized because it's under SEPERATE means and laws than "Holy Matrimony" While Holy Matrimony specifically states between a man and a woman, marriage CANNOT because otherwise it would be doing something religious. It's simply between two legal consenting adults. | |
|
| |
Vagustae Mystic Staff Member
Number of posts : 116 Age : 32 Located : AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!1 Registration date : 2006-09-02
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Sat 2 Sep - 22:16 | |
| - Woltar wrote:
While Holy Matrimony specifically states between a man and a woman, marriage CANNOT because otherwise it would be doing something religious. It's simply between two legal consenting adults. Wow, I was going to say something quite similar. O.o | |
|
| |
Furnina Board Member Plus
Number of posts : 38 Located : Where ever your not Registration date : 2006-09-04
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Mon 4 Sep - 5:48 | |
| I agree With Albel im not too sure on this one | |
|
| |
lili_the_cat Mini Member
Number of posts : 6 Age : 36 Located : Behind you. O: Registration date : 2006-08-30
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays Fri 8 Sep - 6:09 | |
| Of course its ok. I don't see whats wrong with it. o-o This poll was kinda offending to some people. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: the case of the gays | |
| |
|
| |
| the case of the gays | |
|